Author Topic: My comparison video for Turok 2  (Read 7167 times)

Offline DarkShadowRage

  • Raptor
  • ***
  • Posts: 69
  • T:REP 287
  • Let's do this
    • View Profile
    • My Youtube
My comparison video for Turok 2
« on: November 08, 2015, 04:00:21 PM »


finally finished, enjoy.
I'm a gamer and a Youtuber, come check me out if you're Interested. Youtube: http://www.youtube.com/user/DarkShadowRage2

Offline vis

  • Dimetrodon
  • ****
  • Posts: 280
  • T:REP 987
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #1 on: November 08, 2015, 04:51:27 PM »
Good skill for making presentation. I could learn from you : )
(GoT) vis *RS*
 :nuke:

Offline Dinomite

  • Chronoscepter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3166
  • T:REP 9585
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #2 on: November 08, 2015, 04:51:38 PM »
I really advise you to stop making topics for every new thing that happens to you. This belongs in Post T2 videos.
« Last Edit: November 08, 2015, 04:52:21 PM by Dinomite »

The most hated person on the internet.

Offline Drahsid

  • Dimetrodon
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
  • T:REP 946
  • That I be considered worthy
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #3 on: December 06, 2015, 07:58:37 PM »
Here is a copy-paste from my YouTube comment, it has some info on what's different:

PC version has less lighting effects and lower resolution textures by default. The textures on the PC version are also poorly compressed, if you look closely at them you can see a random noise of colors in them, there is the dressing room mod, which can be used to change and modify the textures of the PC version, though no official texture pack has been created. With the right plugin, on N64 emulators you may also change the textures, though once again, there is no texture pack for T2. The N64 version is capped at 30 fps, but on average will run at around 24, dipping to as low as eight. The PC version will run at 30-48 FPS on the D3D driver, with the a 3dfx driver it can be modified to run at any framerate. The sound on the PC version isn't midi, though it isn't recorded at a great level of quality. (Though, still preferable over the N64 version) I also beleive the PC version's sound can be modified through the in-game command window. The PC version has the ability to play dead, whereas the N64 version does not.
Well that didn't work

Offline Dinomite

  • Chronoscepter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3166
  • T:REP 9585
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #4 on: December 07, 2015, 01:29:10 PM »
Thats pretty ironic seeing how PC's were more powerfull than the n64 even in the time the game was released.

The most hated person on the internet.

Offline Drahsid

  • Dimetrodon
  • ****
  • Posts: 276
  • T:REP 946
  • That I be considered worthy
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #5 on: December 07, 2015, 07:20:47 PM »
Thats pretty ironic seeing how PC's were more powerfull than the n64 even in the time the game was released.

Windows 95/98 were not exactly the greatest gaming platform, the reasons for the graphical changes were probably due to that and the lack of great access to hardware or the use of, money and laziness.
Well that didn't work

Offline Dinomite

  • Chronoscepter
  • ******
  • Posts: 3166
  • T:REP 9585
    • View Profile
Re: My comparison video for Turok 2
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2019, 05:21:09 AM »
Thats pretty ironic seeing how PC's were more powerfull than the n64 even in the time the game was released.

Windows 95/98 were not exactly the greatest gaming platform, the reasons for the graphical changes were probably due to that and the lack of great access to hardware or the use of, money and laziness.
Man... These old threads bring me back. Also, how come old posts are showing up as new? Is the forum running on an old backup?

The most hated person on the internet.

 

SimplePortal 2.3.6 © 2008-2014, SimplePortal